Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: I'll believe it when I see it
Date: 07/30/26 10:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Where Israel stands remains unclear

"Bibi" takes a page from "W's" book, and insists that Hamas is still hiding weapons, no matter how much hardware they surrender. You can't prove a negative, so Israel can continue to do as it pleases.

There must be a bill in Congress that is really important to "Bibi".

from the net sifter:

The House of Representatives passed the Fiscal Year 2027 NDAA with Section 219 intact, establishing a United States–Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative. This provision directs the Pentagon to appoint an executive agent to coordinate joint research, development, testing, and industrial cooperation with Israel, covering technologies such as drones, missile defense, AI, cybersecurity, and biotechnology. Attempts by Representatives Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to remove Section 219 were blocked by the House Rules Committee, and the final House vote passed narrowly at 216-212

The Senate version of the NDAA contains a parallel provision, Section 1217, which mirrors Section 219 and incorporates the FUTURES Act framework. However, the Senate has stalled consideration: a procedural vote to begin debate on the bill failed 50-46, falling short of the 60 votes needed for cloture. Opposition comes from senators including Bernie Sanders, Chris Van Hollen, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Jeff Merkley, and Peter Welch, who argue that the provision could compromise U.S. sovereignty and military oversight. Procedural failures mean the Senate has not yet voted on the final NDAA or directly on Section


So, if "Bibi" makes a show of suddenly not being a genocidal maniac, maybe more Senators can be bought off to agree to give Israel an open door to all the US' top secred military research. Soon as he has it, he can repudiate the "deal", and go back to exterminating Pals.

Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community