No. of Recommendations: 2
OR would you like a full Dem Senate and House and let her have full control?
(And I don't mean her. She doesn't control shit -- it's her leash holders who would decide what all happens)
Tough question, honestly.
Harris is a bumbling fool, and you're 100% right that she's not in charge and won't be. If this was say, 8 years ago I'd be all for democrats having full control. They'd pass all sorts of stupid legislation that makes the country worse and there'd be plenty of time for a sane Republican to step in and fix it.
But now? The stakes are too high. 8 years ago we had Obama's terrorist armies causing trouble but now the trouble is coming in the form of old adversaries (Russia) and nascent superpowers (China), the latter, thanks to us offshoring too many critical needs to them and paying them for the privilege, represents an existential threat to the country.
Having a Harris in charge at this moment in time - with a cadre of Squad-curious morons in both chambers of Congress - scares me to my bones. A weak American President in charge of a strong national defense apparatus is one thing...a weak American President in charge of an inadequate national defense apparatus is quite another.
I don't think we can afford a President whose main takeaway from intelligence briefings is the gender language used in the meeting. (Harris really did that).
