Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: Paging Dope1, Mike, Righties
Date: 09/12/24 6:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
The underlying problem with the Republican Party is that deep down inside its leaders have accepted their place in the world.

No, the underlying problem with the Republican Party is that in our system of government you can't advance your agenda without cutting a deal with the opposition party unless you have a supermajority in the Senate, and the GOP hasn't had a supermajority in the Senate for a century. Combine that with the Hastert Rule (which makes cutting deals with the minority party as part of a larger deal impossible) and the punishing effects of conservative media (first talk radio and Rush, then Fox News), and they've taken themselves out of the game.

. With that lack of power comes no real actual responsibility or accountability: they're free to wax on about how things need to be better but they're never strong enough or courageous enough to do anything about it.

It's not about strength or courage. Strength and courage doesn't get legislation passed - deals get legislation passed. Being willing to compromise, accept half a loaf, structure your party so that the leaders are empowered to reach agreements. That, or win 60 votes in the Senate.

That's how the Democrats did it. Not by being stronger or more courageous - by being willing to cut deals to get things done. And even then, the Democrats also have failed to pass almost all of their legislative priorities when they didn't have 58-60 votes.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community