Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: 23 NATO Allies Meet Spending Targets
Date: 06/18/24 5:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
OK. I think you analysis is more-or-less on the mark. Putin definitely felt emboldened because of the weakening bonds among the western nations, thanks to Trump. That is for sure. The obstructionism in Congress by a minority (Republicans) to send weapons to Ukraine likely helped Putin's decision. And, if we care to go back, the lackluster response from the west (and Obama) to the seizure of Crimea certainly didn't help. That harkens back to the seizure of the Sudetenland, which was met with lots of bluster but no action. Same with Crimea. In both cases, the aggressor leaders were correct in their assessment of western resolve (i.e. there was none).

Putin probably overplayed his hand with Ukraine. Maybe he was thinking it would be like seizing Austria in 1936 (i.e. no declaration of war followed, and resistance was token, at best). Instead of a cake-walk, he faces stiff resistance, lots of western aid, sanctions, and a lot of coffins. Ironically, the Reps are responsible for his recent gains because they thought of Ukraine aid as a bargaining chip (at best), without regard to the geopolitical consequences, and played games. Result: Ukraine couldn't hold some of their forward lines anymore and had to fall back until more materiel was received.

As a bonus, the US has accepted several hundred thousand refugees from Russia and Ukraine since the initial invasion. Contrary to what border hawks want, Putin is fueling more refugee/asylum requests in the US. And, as you say, it all stems from Rep and Trumpian actions.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community