Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |
Author: MisterFungi   😊 😞
Number: of 48420 
Subject: Re: As a cancer survivor so far this hits home
Date: 02/10/2025 12:40 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 27
BHM asks, “ How does eliminating whatever LGBTQ funding, that can be identified, diminish the funds available for Cancer Research? "

Pay attention. He just told you what “indirect costs” are. When you apply for a federal grant (or for pretty much any kind of grant, which I did numerous times during 39 years as a research scientist at a major university), “direct costs” do not include maintaining capital equipment, utilities, nonresearch support staff, and the like. Rather than attempt the impossible task of allocating all of those very real costs across potentially hundreds of grants, they’re folded into indirect costs according to mutually agreeable rules. It doesn’t include “LGBTQ agendas” or any such bullshit.

These actions are part of a know-nothing campaign of revenge and retribution against centers of expertise and excellence, period.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds