Post #5320 by commonone on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

albaby1: So - knowing what we know now about the composition and decisions that were made by the SCOTUS, if choosing the winner of the 2016 election were up to your vote, would you choose a corrupt Democrat or a Ron DeSantis?

Still silly.

You're limiting the destructive nature of a corrupt president to three supreme court justices. Trump's corruption extended beyond the supreme court. And in a second term, Trump would replace democracy with a fascist state and destroy most of the departments, agencies, and institutions of government.

No, I do not want a corrupt president regardless of party.

But ask me again after the supreme court broadly overturns the Chevron deference in its next session.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.