Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88912 
Subject: Re: Now That's a BAD Jobs Report
Date: 08/21/25 2:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Albaby spoke up for a two-state solution, a solution that most Jews worldwide support, but is opposed by America's right wing and right-wing Jews in Israel who are intractably opposed to a two-state solution. Some in Netanyahu's coalition are even opposed to the continued existence of Palestinians.

I did. But I think your description above is out of date. It used to be that it was Israel's right-wing Jews that were opposed to a two-state solution. My understanding is that the overwhelming majority of Israeli Jews now oppose it. This is not just a feature of the right-wing coalition over there anymore. It's the mainstream, nay the dominant position.

I have a fair amount of family in Israel. No guarantee they're representative of Israeli Jewish thought - they're not a random sample. But their sense is that if there was a Palestinian state, that wouldn't bring any end to the conflict. That state would still be trying to eliminate Jewish presence in the area. They would just have the resources available to a fully sovereign state, rather than be limited to "insurgency" type attacks. IOW, the equivalent of Hamas - but with an actual air force and tanks.

They do not believe that the Palestinian people, as a group, necessarily reject the idea of peaceful coexistence. But they believe that the most likely outcome of a Palestinian state right now would be for Hamas or its successor members to govern. I mean, how could Hamas not be put in charge? They would have won for the Palestinians the ultimate prize. They would be the Founding Fathers. You think the Palestinian people would choose the Palestinian Authority, or any other group that was ineffectual for decades in getting them a state, over the folks who actually did it?

For them, the two-state solution means trading Hamas cowering in tunnels for Hamas with an army and tanks and an air force. It's not hard to see why they're leaning against that...
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (120) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy