And pro tip: when you're accusing someone else of having a "Schtick", you should understand what the word means. And then avoid doing...what you're accusing others of doing.

But I'm doing exactly what you do on purpose. I'm not trying to avoid schtick, I'm trying - and apparently succeeding - at duplicating your schtick.

And that schtick is completely devoid of fact or thinking. It's just mindless repetition of a single formula: "me good, them bad". Everything you ever say boils down to that. But you aren't smart enough to see that. And that's why I'm good and you are bad.

--Peter

Pro tip: I did make a brief comment on the substance of your reply. It was something along the lines of the New York Post lies a lot and Hersh is a senile old fool. Once that is determined, there's no point in discussing any further details, because nothing in the article can be trusted to be fact. But again, I'm smart and can see that, and you are dumb and can't tell when you are being lied to.