Post #28781 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Only in the minds of the deranged (Trump & MAGA, but I repeat myself) does anyone think there has been “no checking at all”, or that anyone has ever proposed “not checking at all”. - Goofy

-----------------

It is not binary, "checking vs not checking". There is a broad range of data and process elements to collecting and counting ballots. Checking one is good but insufficient.

The resistance to providing access to election data in many jurisdictions in 2020 created long lasting suspicions. If checking multiple elements is as universal and consistent as it should be and as you claim, then those possessing that data should be eager to show it. That's all.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.