Post #4102 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Also, when the pandemic first hit, a lot of deaths were being classified as respiratory failures (or heart failures, or whatever). Which was true. But if -which apparently happened more than it should have- they didn't go into more detail, it wouldn't be classified as COVID. So the figures, at least in the first year, likely understated it. Which is why some folks started looking at "excess deaths" as a more accurate gauge of the pandemic. - 1pg

-----------------

I agree with you. Just to be clear, my post was intended to show there were and are legitimate questions about the numbers reported and the Ministry of Truth has no business colluding with big tech to suppress opinions that question their numbers.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.