Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48412 
Subject: Re: “Settled” climate science…
Date: 06/17/2025 2:20 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
And here’s the rub:

The authors admit they don’t know whether the increase in old carbon emissions is from natural variability or anthropogenic disturbance. In their own words:

“Whether or not anthropogenic perturbation has increased the leak of old carbon…remains a notable knowledge gap”.

Yet we’re told with absolute certainty that the Earth will warm by 1.5°C unless we ban gas stoves, eat bugs, and shut down reliable energy. This study exposes just how deeply uncertain and unresolved the feedbacks in the carbon cycle remain.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds