Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: 34 Felony Counts
Date: 04/05/2023 10:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Criminal violation of campaign finance regulations. He's arguing state and federal. There's arguments against both, but it's still a plausible enough argument to support an indictment.

LOl. Then the case is going to be thrown out 30 seconds after the judge bangs his gavel. 1, Bragg has zero standing to charge Trump with federal election violations. And even if he did, the accountable federal entity - The FEC - already ruled there was no there there.

Secondly, Trump never ran on a state ballot. He ran for President on a federal ballot in 2016. The payments were made in 2017.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds