Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: Why Not O&G? Is it the IEA Energy Outlook_
Date: 07/14/25 2:47 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
I agree that prudent view of the future has to encompass (among other scenarios) the one that at present seems most likely.

As for whether the report is a cause of the current low cycle of valuation for the companies involved, that may or may not be a factor. Beats me. Stock prices do things for strange reasons.

there’s a case to be made that O&G could provide a significant added opportunity for investors to build a long term portfolio at reasonable prices today...

There are merits to the investment case, but to me the two main arguments against a big move of a portfolio into oil and gas are:

* There is no such thing as oil and gas production, merely oil and gas extraction. So the business, as it sits on any given day, is always in wind-down mode. To prevent that, it has to perpetually reinvent itself by getting access to additional stock. In that way it's a bit like a company selling high tech devices - the current product will no longer generate revenue after a while, so something new has to be found, over and over forever. Worse in this case, as every round gets harder and harder in O&G.

* Obviously, no control over pricing. Not fatal if you're the low cost extractor, but definitely not one of the qualities you WANT in a business.

Neither of these is fatal, but they are certainly the stand-out issues on why it's not the perfect line of business to be in. At least not "all in".

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community