Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Faster but Vulnerable - Recess Appointment Edition
Date: 11/14/24 3:52 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
Not necessarily. It took AGES last time for Trump to assemble his Cabinet because the democrats played games to stop him from governing. If there is a mistake to avoid, it's in trusting them to accept losing the election and allowing a new administration to govern.

They won't make that mistake again, so hence the recess appointments.


AGES? Really? Donald Trump had his last cabinet official confirmed on April 28, 2017 (Acosta at Labor). Coincidentally, that's the exact same day that Barack Obama had his final cabinet official confirmed - April 28, 2009 (Sibellius at HHS).

It's also worth remembering that the Democrats in question here didn't lose their elections. There's 47 Democratic Senators that won their last election, just like Donald Trump won his. So they also are fully entitled to the powers of their office, which include having a role in the Senate's confirmation hearings.

Accepting that Donald Trump won the election does not require anyone to stand down from using their office to try to affect how he governs. Again, the federal government is deliberately and intentionally not like a business, where the CEO is the only one in charge. Trump is entitled to make his nominations....and the Senate is entitled to Advise and Consent, which may involve making those nominees provide information or sit for hearings, and even (perhaps) not get confirmed at all.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community