Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Money Laundering Trump Family
Date: 08/03/26 12:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 22
Fast forward to March 2025. Trump’s back in the White House, the grievance machine is running at full capacity, and the Trump Organization and Eric Trump — yes, that Eric — sue Capital One in Florida. Their theory? The bank “debanked” them because of its “woke” beliefs and because it wanted to cash in on the anti-Trump political mood after January 6th. Persecution! Bias! The war on conservatives comes for the family business!
Cool story.
On Friday, Capital One filed its response, and folks, it is a beauty. The bank told the court — for the first time ever, publicly, on the record — that it closed those accounts for anti-money laundering reasons. Not vibes. Not politics. Not because some HR intern in a Patagonia vest got the ick. Because the bank’s actual financial crimes unit spent months analyzing the accounts and reviewing them under bank policy and federal regulatory guidance, and then said “yeah, we’re done here.”

Let me repeat that, because it’s genuinely historic: according to Reuters, this is the first time any bank has formally tied money-laundering concerns to the sitting president’s family business. In a court document. That the Trumps forced them to file. By suing them.
They did this to themselves. They walked into court, pointed at the bank, and screamed “TELL EVERYONE WHY YOU DUMPED US,” and the bank went “...okay.”


Rest of article with supporting documentation here:

open.substack.com - Trump sued his bank for being woke

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to wzambon here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community