Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: onepoorguy ⎊✺  😊 😞
Number: of 88925 
Subject: Re: 1500 federal troops to border
Date: 01/23/25 12:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
They will be detained until their hearing. No more catch and release and disappear.

We talked about that a year ago. I forget albaby's numbers, but a sizeable majority show up for their hearings. They want asylum, think their claims are valid, and try to play by the rules. So they show up.

I suppose there will be an option for them to self deport rather than wait for what could be several months for their hearing.

I think the average is 2-4 years, IIRC. Too lazy to look up the lengthy discussion we had last January (2024).

Yeah, it will take a lot of resources. So what!

And time. We have to build the detention facilities first. And staff them.

Aren't you always the budget hawk? So you're OK with your taxes going up to pay for this.

FWIW, I'm OK with detaining them provided we have humane facilities to house them, and staff the courts so your "months" guesstimate above is accurate.

And I've been saying for a while that taxes need to go up. A lot. We have to close the Republican-made deficit, and the only way to do that is sacrifice vital programs (which would be very unpopular), or raise taxes to Reagan levels. Adding the expense you're talking about would require even more. Few Republicans would agree with that. In which case, you can't have your detention facilities and staffed immigration courts.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy