Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Mark Carney Wins In Canada...
Date: 04/29/25 2:54 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
You think tanks are necessary for us to be an adversary to Canada? There's a reason why trade war is the metaphor that gets used.M</>

Carney is running around saying that Trump wants their land and resources and you're echoing that. To hear Carney tell it he expects US Paratroopers to come flying across the border Red Dawn style any day now. I'm half surprised he didn't scream WOLVERINES!!!!!! during his victory speech yesterday.

He's doing what left wing politicians do the world over: excuse their failures by hiding the weenie someplace else. In this case, south of his border.

And those very, very aggressive moves will involve harming large swaths of Canada. He's not trying to hide this. He apparently believes that because we buy many billions of dollars of goods from Canada that we are "subsidizing" them, and he wants that to stop.

You know who else made that very argument?

Justin Trudeau.

Now, why would the leader of Canada be raising a MAGA talking point? Do you think there may be even a slight amount of truth to it?

If not, then why did JT go there?

There's no indication that Trump can run over anyone in a negotiation. So far, all that's happened is the U.S. unilaterally giving concessions all over the place, because we've managed to create a situation where we have the weaker negotiating position and it's getting worse as time passes.

Is that so? I think you're not watching China as closely as you should. Google "ethane China imports" and tell me what you find.

Trump needs Xi more than Xi needs Trump, and that increases over time

Hmm, let's repeat this back to you:
So the country that runs a trade *surplus* is 100% in the driver's seat when the country that has a massive trade *deficit* cries foul?

Sure about that? Are you familiar enough with Chinese internal politics to muse over what happens to Xi if all of a sudden thousand of Chinese factories sit idle and a bunch of ships sit out at port with nowhere to go?

That's what sidelined the discussions with Japan

Also not correct. The Japanese and South Koreans are waiting for their elections before doing anything.

and the same is apparently happening with India.

Nope. Not according to Modi himself.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community