Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84360 
Subject: Re: Trump's NABJ Interview Disaster
Date: 07/31/24 6:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
The video of this 35 minute appearance should be required viewing. It reflects all of the Trump trademarks.

The first question asked him why black voters should consider voting for him after he has pushed false claims about rivals like Nikki Haley and Barack Obama, has told black Congresswomen who were born in America to "go back where they came from" and used words like animal and rabid to describe black district attorneys.

His first words of response: "I don't think I have ever been asked a question in such a horrible manner." Later in that first answer... "Are you with ABC? Because I think they are a fake news network...."

The second question asked him if he thought comments from Republican leaders about Kamala Harris being a "DEI hire" were appropriate.

Trump's first reaction was to ask the reporter to define her terms. Of course, that at first might SOUND like a clever politician ensuring any purposeful / tricky ambiguity on the part of the reporter is clarified before diving in. Of course, it might also double as an attempt for Trump to hear a few more buzzwords -- "diversity, equity, inclusion" -- to find the right sound byte because he couldn't remember the meaning of the DEI acronym.

The reporter simply spelled out DEI as diversity, equity and inclusion and repeated her question.

IMMEDIATELY, Trump's tone switched. He basically said he wasn't sure, he's known Kamala at a distance for a while but not closely but she used to strongly identify as Indian then suddenly, "she went black a few years ago," saying the word "black" with the same strange, sarcastic lilt he uses for trigger words in stump speeches. He rambled on that path for 40-50 seconds and the reporter re-posed her question again. At that point, he attacked the reporter and claimed the event started 35 minutes late because "you couldn't get your equipment to work" and "it was a very nasty question" and "it's a disgrace."

In short, the fact that

a) a REPORTER
b) who was BLACK
c) and a WOMAN
d) asked him a TOUGH QUESTION

literally pissed him off and triggered his classic angry response.

The next question was a softball posed by Harris Faulkner from Fox about inflation and its impacts on the black community. Faulkner's question included a lot of detailed facts and figures (of questionable validity but that's not important to this point...) but was long enough it should have given Trump time to think, re-organize his thoughts, pick out something from Faulkner's question to tie to a previously memorized talking point and go from there.

Instead, Trump began talking over Faulkner towards the end of her question, claiming audio problems were preventing him from hearing everything she said and making it difficult to understand her question. Then... He pivoted by stating the audio problems were due to the fact that clearly the first reporter didn't know anything about setting up a stage. As if ANY of the reporters on the stage were responsible for the "roadie" work to set up the venue.

Why would anyone assume that? If they do, they're an idiot and likely expressing some inner bigotry along the lines of "you can't be on stage as a deserving reporter suitable for interview ME, you must be the help." If he knows better, it doesn't actually help his case because it demonstrates his inability to compartmentalize and MOVE ON. He cannot let go of any perceieved offense, no matter how slight or imaginary.

Based on opening remarks, this appearance was scheduled to last one hour. The exact scheduled start and end times of this event are not clear, it isn't clear if the event did start on time or late and it isn't clear what the sound quality was like on stage. The sound quality of the video clip was not good but video quality is not synonymous with house audio quality. What IS clear from the video is that Trump cannot "perform" in any unscripted setting, especially one involving those not 100% aligned with his twisted reality, without converting independent qestioning into "attacks" which then tie to his deeply seated and barely disguised contempt for pretty much anyone who isn't him. His handlers seemed to recognize this and signaled to the producers they were yanking their candidate off the stage after 35 minutes.

We need to do the same in November.

WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community