Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (83) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: Hmmmm
Date: 07/31/24 6:23 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Hamas was voted-in. The last election the Palestinians were allowed. There's no certainty that this would happen again. Most of the Palestinians living today have no memory of ever having voted, because of Hamas.

And after they were voted in, they purged Fatah from Gaza through violence and murder.

But let's be realistic - if a Palestinian state were to emerge from the wreckage of the current conflict, how could Hamas possibly lose an election? They would be the Founding Fathers of that country - the ones who correctly tossed aside Fatah's strategy of trying to gain a state through peaceful negotiations. They would be the ones who forged a Palestinian state through blood and fighting and sacrifice. They'd win in a landslide!

And if they didn't, there's always the Taliban option of just taking over once the multinational force leaves....

I don't see a middle ground. Take a chance on peace, or finish what you started and displace them all (killing most of them).

Or do neither. Just continue the current unhappy medium. You never have peace, because Hamas (and others) will keep trying to kill you; but you're not going to kill all the Palestinian people to prevent that. You try to find a middle ground, and just do that indefinitely.

If the two "final" outcomes are the destruction of the Jewish people in the area, or the destruction of the Palestinian people in the area, the least-bad outcome is the non-final one - where the indefinite status quo just goes on interminably....
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (83) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community