Post #36043 by albaby1 on the Berkshire Hathaway board

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 10

And the Supremes will rule on who it does apply to.

Not necessarily. SCOTUS review is discretionary. If they agree with the lower court decision, they don't have to take up the case - and they almost never do, if they think the lower court got it right. So unless there are four votes on the Court supporting the Administration's theory, this might not even get to SCOTUS.

I know he was appointed by Reagan. Again, an unfortunate trait of the dumber members of this board is to try and score points in posts. It really doesn't, so please don't emulate that behavior.

You said something that was incorrect, so I replied with the correct facts. That's not scoring points - I didn't case aspersions on you or say anything negative about you. I didn't say anything more than that the judge was a Reagan appointee.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Berkshire Hathaway FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.