Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Trump makes demands
Date: 01/26/26 2:02 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Traditionally, anyone arrested, at the local, or Federal, level, would have an expectation of legal due process.

Sure - but if they're here illegally, and they get turned over to the feds upon being arrested, then they'll face deportation on arrest. Getting due process for the crime they were arrested on (which, again, more likely than not results in no charges or acquittal) doesn't spare them from that consequence.

So people get reluctant to call in the police as often, because if they call the cops it might result in a person who is innocent of any present wrongdoing getting deported. Which is a pretty harsh consequence, so unless what's going on is really serious, a person who was considering calling the cops might think twice.

Ideally, someone properly convicted and imprisoned, would be deported to their home country, and handed over to the authorities there. Then the authorities in that country could decide to have him serve out his sentence in their prison, or walk free, on their streets.

I'm no international lawyer, but I don't think criminal justice systems work that way. There's treaties on international enforcement of civil judgements and other legal matters, but I don't think countries will keep someone in their own prisons based on a conviction from another jurisdiction without the prisoner's consent.

Plus - that's not without its own concerns. Do we want to leave it up to a foreign government whether someone who's been convicted here of a serious crime to perhaps just let them go free?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community