Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |
Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84351 
Subject: Re: ICE. They Really Are Nazi Thugs
Date: 01/26/26 2:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
if a case is brought at the state level, it can be removed to Federal court - delay tactics, etc.

Doesn't matter. State law will control, not federal law. You need to learn about the law.


I know state law controls Jerry, but it does matter. Note "delay tactics, etc." It's a tactical decision.

"Removing a state case against an ICE officer to federal court—often based on the federal officer removal statute for acts done "under color of office"—can inhibit or slow the case by changing the venue to a more favorable federal forum, potentially widening the jury pool, and utilizing different procedural rules. It often causes procedural delays, as a federal judge must first decide if the case should remain in federal court or be remanded.

Procedural Delays and Venue Shift: The removal process itself causes delays, as the case is temporarily paused while federal judges determine if the officer was acting within their federal authority, notes The Guardian.
Federal Immunity Protections: Federal courts may be more inclined to uphold federal immunity defenses, which can protect officers from state-level liability for actions taken while performing their duties, notes The Guardian.
Different Legal Standards: Federal court may offer more favorable procedural rules, a larger, potentially more sympathetic jury pool, and federal judges who may be more inclined toward the officer's defense, notes Isaac Wiles.

These factors can significantly slow down the litigation process and potentially lead to the dismissal of charges if the officer is found to be immune, as indicated in the context of federal officer removal statutes."
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Lambo here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community