Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: albaby1 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 80409 
Subject: Re: Condi's take on Iran
Date: 06/04/26 2:21 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
Which is one of many reasons (outlined earlier) why the JCPOA was a failure.

Then Trump will never get a nuclear deal. It is inconceivable that Tehran would agree to the sort of restrictions that were in the JCPOA (much less anything more stringent) in exchange for nothing. That the sanctions and asset freezes remain in place forever? Or that any unfrozen assets go to non-Iranian parties?

Strategic patience is hard, and it isn’t always satisfying. But time is on the side of the U.S. and its allies. Reaching no deal is fine.

Reaching no deal is where we were in February. Reaching no deal means that we're back where we were after the JCPOA went away and Iran was engaged in unrestricted uranium enrichment. Reaching no deal means Iran retains all it's ability to get a nuclear weapon (which Trump has said is intolerable) as existed in February, and which was so dangerous that it was necessary to launch this war. How is that now "fine"? If it's fine, why did we do this? Because we needed to eliminate Iran's navy?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds