Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: CNN tries to defend Fordow BDA reporting
Date: 06/27/25 1:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Her real job is to be a Deep State/democrat propagandist with work mean to affect the tenor of national politics.
There you are with the deep state again. Nice of you to telegraph big bullshit is coming.

Some of her Greatest Hits include working with "Fusion" Ken Dilanian on the bogus Steele dossier

It wasn't bogus, it was op research that included every rumor that came down the pike.

and hyping the "51 intelligence experts" who falsely claimed that Hunter Biden's laptop had "All the hallmarks of Russian disinformation".

Nothing wrong with that and as long as it's presented as such it's not a false claim.

She came out with a breathless story that intimated that the airstrikes by US B-2 bombers on Iran's nuclear development site at Fordow caused limited damage. She cited anonymous officials in her reporting and this report was intended to blunt any wave of success.

Problem is...she didn't caveat her report, and it only took a few days for it to be debunked by several


The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. <-- that is a &*(&%@# caveat.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Lambo here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community