Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again

Welcome, Shrewd — a quick, honest note
Shrewd’m is a free community of independent investors, and this is a place to learn — not to be sold to. No bank, broker or financial service sponsors these pages; nothing here is for sale — no products, no accounts, no funds, no fees. Everything is education and conversation, offered freely. We take a cheerful, irreverent view of Wall Street’s noise, because the whole Shrewd idea is that you think for yourself and take responsibility for your own decisions. In our experience the two truest marks of a happy life are wonderfully simple: staying in control of your own life, and keeping a mind that never stops learning. That is all this place is really for.
None of this is personalised financial advice — just ideas, shared in good faith, for you to weigh for yourself.
« PreviousPage 2 of 3

Why You Were Never Told

There is no conspiracy. There is something quieter and more complete: an absence of commission. Nobody is paid to ring your doorbell about the thing that works.

The product with no salesman

An index fund carries no sales load, pays no commission, and charges a fee so small it barely feeds its own paperwork — the big ones now run near 0.08 percent a year against an industry average around 0.50, and Bogle structured Vanguard so the funds’ owners are the investors themselves. Admirable — and commercially invisible. No commission means no salesman; no salesman means no advertisement, no conference, no gentle steer from the person across the bank desk. The brochures on that desk describe the products that pay the desk, a machinery this community’s companion guide, Financial Advisors and Debt, examines up close. The shrewdest product in finance goes unmentioned for the same reason the tap goes unmentioned in a bottled-water shop.

Notice, in passing, how a certain community reached the same position from the other side. Shrewd’m sells no funds, takes no commissions, and runs no advertising against its members’ attention — deliberately, so that it can look after the interests of independent investors with a straight face, educate freely, and keep the boards what they are: people enjoying the argument for its own sake. When nobody in the room is selling, the tap finally gets discussed — across every board here, daily. That is how Shrewds investors heard about all of this: from each other.

Two honest recipes

Even inside indexing there is one genuinely interesting choice, and it rewards a Shrewd’s attention. The familiar index weights companies by size — the giants dominate. But buy the same five hundred stocks in equal slices and something curious happens: over the full twenty-year record, S&P’s own research puts the equal-weight version ahead, about 11.5 percent a year against 10.3. The edge is not magic; it is a lean toward the smaller companies in the list, plus a cool-headed rebalancing discipline that trims whatever has swollen and tops up whatever has lagged — buying low and selling high by rule rather than by nerve. Honesty requires the other half: in stretches when a few giants carry everything, as in the recent mega-cap years, the ordinary version wins. Both are indexing; the argument between them is a pleasure, not a peril.

The same 500 stocks, two recipes20-year annualised
Equal slices, rebalanced by rule≈ 11.5%
Weighted by company size (the familiar index)≈ 10.3%
S&P’s own 20-year research; mega-cap years flip the verdict — both are honest indexing.

The enemy in the mirror

Now for the deeper reason this guide exists, because the fee arithmetic is only half the case. The fund’s return and the investor’s return are different numbers: Morningstar’s long-running Mind the Gap studies put the difference near 1.2 percent a year — roughly 15 percent of a decade’s wealth — lost to hopping in after rises and out after falls. In 2024 the S&P returned 25 percent while the average equity-fund investor collected 16.5 (source: DALBAR’s tally). The vehicles did their job; their owners undid it.

And where the behaviour is heaviest, the damage is worst. The famous Barber–Odean study in the Journal of Finance — titled, wonderfully, “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth” — followed 66,456 households and found the most active traders earning 11.4 percent while the market gave 17.9, churning three-quarters of their portfolios every year:

The cost of activityEarned per year
The market (Barber–Odean sample period)17.9%
The most active traders inside it11.4%
The S&P 500 in 202425.0%
The average equity-fund investor in 2024 (source: DALBAR)16.5%
Same markets, same years — the gap is the behaviour.

Understand what that habit is: it is not investing, it is gaming, and an entire industry of apps, alerts, zero-commission trading and financial television exists to train it into you — the same playbook, note, by which the debt industry trains borrowing. The harm is not only financial. A traded portfolio colonises its owner: the phone checked at dinner, the sleep lost to a position, the self-respect chained to a ticker. Shrewd investors regard that as a cost no return justifies — and the research says the return isn’t there anyway.

The Shrewd insight: the industry’s products are engineered to keep you acting, because your action is its income. The index fund is the one product that pays you to stop.

What stopping is worth — in dollars over a lifetime, and in calm during the storms — is the final page.

Share this article
« PreviousPage 2 of 3Next »
Joining is free, and what you write is read by a community where a quietly self-made investor, a hedge-fund manager and a wonderfully curious beginner are read exactly alike. Good thinking is recommended by name; the best runs as The Shrewd'm Weekly, under your byline.
Join Shrewd’m free »
Mechanical Investing — the world’s most expert MI community
The Mechanical Investing board at Shrewd'm is, quite simply, the most knowledgeable Mechanical Investing community in the world. Mechanical Investing strips emotion out of the process: stocks are ranked by rules across a large population, back-tested, and — more importantly — judged on real post-discovery results rather than data-mined history. From the classic screens of the late 1990s to the modern champions, this community generously posts the up-to-date rankings for the popular screens every month (so you don’t even need a Value Line or SI Pro subscription), and its members will patiently help with any question. The calibre and steadfast generosity of the people here is the real distinction — hardcore knowledge you won’t assemble anywhere else.
Read the Mechanical Investing board »
Mechanical Investing FAQ »



Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community